Abbeville vs. Chicago: "Effete"


Oh, man. Some style manuals just weren’t meant to be arbiters of style. Thumbing through the Chicago Manual‘s quaintly-named “Glossary of Troublesome Expressions,” we came across this stunning act of capitulation:

effete. Traditionally, it has meant “decadent, worn out, sterile.” Today it is often used to mean either “snobbish” or “effeminate.” Because of its ambiguity, the word is best avoided altogether.

That’s right: rather than argue for one definition or the other, or attempt to reconcile the two, Chicago thinks we should simply eliminate the word from the language! Just forget, as a people, that it ever existed! One can imagine the poor editor who wrote this sitting at his desk, worn down by life’s stormy vicissitudes and one too many battles over punctuation, clutching his head and crying, “Damn you, ‘effete’! You’ve caused me too much heartache! Just go—go, and never darken my door again!”

But as we look ahead to the VP debate tonight, we ask our readers: is this truly the American way? Did Teddy Roosevelt surrender like this when he led his men up San Juan Hill? Did Chicago itself surrender after the whole place was nearly burned down by a cow? And anyway, couldn’t “effete” still be used for phenomena to which both definitions apply—things that are decadent, worn out, snobbish, and effeminate all at once? Like Horace Engdahl?


Filed under Abbeville vs. Chicago, Books and Publishing

2 responses to “Abbeville vs. Chicago: "Effete"

  1. I’m gone to tell my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this website on regular basis to take updated from hottest news.

  2. Argelia Kruzan

    Well, it’s a very neat concept for sure. I hope my posting gaffe wasn’t up long enough to exert any improper influence and I apologize if it did. I’m totally in awe of people who are able to solve these metas. I guess it’s an aspect of creative problem solving intelligence which is just beyond me. Oh Well. Last week’s, (which involved two clues which could function as a 5th theme answer), I didn’t understand even after reading the explanation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s